UNIVERSITY REVIEWERS BY CONTRACT TYPE
The following work-flows are intended to serve as informational guide(s) to better understand critical path of the review & approval process. This provides transparency for identified Core & Supplemental Reviewers by contract type. As the contracts policies mature, the University will determine established suggested "reviewer" time commitment by contract type. These guides allow requestor's the ability to gauge appropriate time necessary to allow for appropriate review. The identified reviewers do not replace any potential "consultations" that may ensue prior to entering the official review process. Where appropriate "consultations" will aide users to ensure adequate pre-requisites are addressed timely.
Work-flows For Reference:
All contracts are subject to further assessment and additional review as deemed appropriate or necessary outside of those identified on the work-flows provided. The University review does not replace department level review practices.
- Critical Path 3-Stage Overview
- Affiliation Agreements
- Construction (Design Build and Small Builder Only)
- Facilities (Facility On-Call Agreements Only) - Revised 5/30/19
- Facility Use (Includes Design Build and Small Builder Agreements)
- General (Includes below list, Excludes Business Associate Agreement (BAA))
- Addendum to Contract
- Amendment to Contract
- Performance Agreement
- Performance Agreement Addendum
- Service (Pacific Provided)
- General (Business Associate Agreement (BAA) Only)
- Research (Incoming & Outgoing)
- Technology - Revised 05/30/19
(For informational purposes - subject to change)